Author
Disaster and Emergency Management Program, School of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada
Is the Management of Tehran Disaster through Designated Auxiliary Provinces Scientific and Practical?
Ali Asgari
Disaster and Emergency Management Program, School of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3
ARTICLE INFO |
Letter to the Editor Article history: Received: 1 Jan 2018 Revised: 18 Jan 2018 Accepted: 30 Feb 2018 |
* Corresponding Author: Ali Asgari Address: Disaster and Emergency Management Program, School of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3 Email: Asgary@yorku.ca Tel: |
F |
Although this method which is based on the use of resources and facilities of neighboring provinces, basically seems to be a suitable and useful solution, there are drawbacks to implementing it.
The idea of using auxiliary provinces for disaster response in Tehran dates back to the middle of the 20s. For example, based on the information available in 2006, the map of the divisions of Tehran among the auxiliary and successor provinces was developed and published (Figure 1). Obviously, in the new division that has been revealed in January 2018, the 2006 map and its divisions have not been used, yet.
$('.collapse').on('shown.bs.collapse', function(){
$(this).parent().find(".glyphicon-plus").removeClass("glyphicon-plus").addClass("glyphicon-minus");
}).on('hidden.bs.collapse', function(){
$(this).parent().find(".glyphicon-minus").removeClass("glyphicon-minus").addClass("glyphicon-plus");
});
1. Jensen J, Thompson S. The Incident Command System: a literature review. Disasters. 2016; 40(1): 158-82.
2. Thomas TL, Hsu EB, Kim HK, Colli S, Arana G, Green GB. The incident command system in disasters: evaluation methods for a hospital-based exercise. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2005;20(1):14-23. |