Volume 2, Issue 2 (July - December 2019)                   JDER 2019, 2(2): 61-73 | Back to browse issues page

DOI: 10.18502/jder.v2i2.1512

XML Print

Disaster and Emergency Management, York University, Toronto, Canada
Abstract:   (856 Views)
Introduction: Disasters can impact national economies in many ways, one of which is through international trade components such as export. with estimated direct damages of over US$211 billion, the Great Eastern Japan earthquake of 2011 has been the costliest disaster in the history of Japan. Although this disaster occurred in an area with lower share in the national and global economy, many Japanese and non-Japanese firms outside the affected area were affected by the ripple effects of this disaster. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which changes in post disaster exports of Japan can be attributed to this disaster.
Methods: A modified version of shift-share method was employed to examine the impacts of the disaster on Japan’s export. Considering the regional economic analysis, shift-share analysis is often used to compare regional economic changes with regard to national changes. It decomposes the regional economy changes into universal, industry mix, and competitive advantage components. In this study, an up-scaled shift share analysis was conducted that examined the changes of Japan export versus the world. Two datasets were used in this study. The first dataset included Japan’s exports and the other contained the world’s exports. . The World Trade Organization (WTO)’s online database constituted the main data source.
Results: According to the shift-share analysis, Japan experienced some increase in export during the study years, which was due to the overall universal export increases. In the same period, Japan lost some of its exports due to the industry mix component. The results showed that the 2011 Great East Japan disaster had a substantial impact on Japan’s exports through the export reduction caused by the competitive effect.
Conclusions: Large-scale disasters may have a significant impact on the overall national economy and export. The results of this study highlighted that the disaster had a negative competitive advantage for all economic sectors of Japan.
Full-Text [PDF 793 kb]   (186 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (253 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/01/2 | Accepted: 2019/09/23 | Published: 2019/09/29

1. Asgary A, Rowell B. Post-disaster Reconstruction and World Trade Mechanisms: An Agenda for Enquiry, In Lizarralde, G., Duyne Barenstein, J., Cardosi, G., Oliver, A. (eds). Sustainable Post-Disaster Reconstruction: From Recovery to Risk Reduction. Conference proceedings. 2013 international i-Rec conference. Ascona, Switzerland. Montreal: Groupe de recherche IF, GRIF, Université de Montréal. July 18, 2015. p55-64 .Available at: http://www.grif.umontreal.ca/i-Rec2013/ 55- 64_ Asgary.pdf.
2. UNISDR. The Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). 2013, Available at: http:// www. preventionweb.net/ english/ hyogo/gar/2013/en/ home/GAR_2013/ GAR_2013_2.html (retrieved on 16.10.2014).
3. Garrett TJ. Long-run evolution of the global economy: Earth's Future. 2014, 2(3), 127-151. [DOI:10.1002/2013EF000171]
4. Kunreuther H, Yen Koo C, Rose A, editors. The Economics of Natural Hazards. In: Introduction Howard Kunreuther and Adam Rose. Northampton: MA: Edward Elgar. 2004.
5. Okuyama Y. Economic modeling for disaster impact analysis: past, present, and future, Economic Systems Research. 2007, 19(2), 115-24. [DOI:10.1080/09535310701328435]
6. Hallegatte S, Przyluski V. The economics of natural disasters: concepts and methods. The World Bank; 2010: Paper Series No. 5057. [DOI:10.1596/1813-9450-5507]
7. Doyle L, Noy I. The short-run nationwide macroeconomic effects of the Canterbury earthquakes. New Zealand Economic Papers. 2015 May 4;49(2):134-56. [DOI:10.1080/00779954.2014.885379]
8. MacKenzie CA, Santos JR, Barker K. Measuring changes in international production from a disruption: Case study of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, International Journal of Production Economics, 2012; 138(2), 293-302. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.032]
9. International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Policies of IEA Countries Japan: 2016. Available at: https://webstore.iea.org/energy-policies-of-iea-countries-japan-2016-review
10. Batty D. Japan shuts down last working nuclear reactor. The Guardian, 2012.
11. Soble J. Court orders one of Japan's two operating nuclear plants to shut down. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www. nytimes. com/2016/03/10/world/asia/japan-nuclear-plant. html. 2016.
12. Johnson R. Japan's 2011 earthquake and tsunami: Food and agriculture implications. Current Politics and Economics of Northern and Western Asia. 2011;20(4):651..
13. Carvalho VM, Nirei M, Saito Y, et al. Supply chain disruptions: Evidence from the great east japan earthquake. PRI Discussion Paper Series.2016; (No.16A-15) [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2893221]
14. Ando M, Kimura F. How did the Japanese Exports Respond to Two Crises in the International Production Networks? The Global Financial Crisis and the Great East Japan Earthquake. Asian Economic Journal. 2012, 26(3), 261-287. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8381.2012.02085.x]
15. Todo Y, Nakajima K, Matous P. How do supply chain networks affect the resilience of firms to natural disasters? Evidence from the great east Japan Earthquake. Journal of Regional Science. 2015, 55 (2), 209-229. [DOI:10.1111/jors.12119]
16. Fujimoto T. Supply chain competitiveness and robustness: a lesson from the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and supply chain "virtual dualization". Manufacturing Management Research Center. 2011.
17. Ye L, Abe M. The impacts of natural disasters on global supply chains, ARTNeT Working Paper Series, 2012;(115).
18. Kajitani Y, Chang SE, Tatano H. Economic Impacts of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake and Tsunami. Earthquake Spectra. 2013, 29(S1), 457-478. [DOI:10.1193/1.4000108]
19. Wu LH, Hayashi H. The impact of disasters on Japan's inbound tourism demand. Journal of Disaster Research. 2014, 9, 699-708. [DOI:10.20965/jdr.2014.p0699]
20. Belke A. Natural disaster in japan: Implications for world financial markets. Asia Europe Journal. 2013, 11(4), 433-444. [DOI:10.1007/s10308-013-0362-6]
21. James F and Hughes J. A test of shift and share analysis as a predictive device'. Journal of Regional Science. 1973, 13(2). 223-31. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9787.1973.tb00397.x]
22. Ireland TC, Moomaw RL. The competitive effect in shift-share analysis: a will of wisp? Review of Regional Studies. 1981, 11, 72-8.
23. Andrikopoulos A, Brox J, Carvalho E. Shift-share analysis and the potential for predicting regional growth patterns: some evidence for the region of Ontario. Growth and Change. 1990, 21(1), 1-10. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2257.1990.tb00506.x]
24. Esteban-Marquillas JM. A reinterpretation of shift-share analysis'. Regional and Urban Economic. 1972, 2(3). 249-61. [DOI:10.1016/0034-3331(72)90033-4]
25. Arcelus F. An extension of shift-share analysis'. Growth and Change. 1984, 15(1), 3-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2257.1984.tb00719.x]
26. McDonough CC, Sihag BB. The incorporation of multiple bases into shift-share analysis'.Growth and Change.1991, 22(1), 1-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2257.1991.tb00537.x]
27. Noponen H, Markusen A, Driessen K. Trade and American cities: who has the comparative advantage? Econ Develop Q. 1997, 11:67-87. [DOI:10.1177/089124249701100106]
28. Noponen H, Markusen A, Driessen K. International trade and shift-share analysis: a response to Dinc and Haynes. Econ Develop Q. 1998, 12, 344-350. [DOI:10.1177/089124249801200407]
29. Dinc M, Haynes KE. Productivity, international trade and reference area interactions in shift-share analysis: some operational notes. Growth Change 2005, 36(3), 374-394. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2005.00282.x]
30. Chiang SH. Shift-share analysis and international trade, The Annals of Regional Science. 2011, 49(3), 571-588. [DOI:10.1007/s00168-011-0465-1]
31. Wadley D, Smith P. Straightening up shift-share analysis. The Annals of Regional Science. 2003;37(2):259-61. [DOI:10.1007/s001680300124]
32. Evans GK. Spatial shift-share analysis of the leisure and hospitality sector on the Gulf Coast following hurricane Katrina. 2008.
33. Chang SE. Transportation Performance, Disaster Vulnerability, and Long-Term Effects of Earthquakes. Proceedings of the Second EuroConference on Global Change and Catastrophe Risk Management.Laxenburg, Austria. 2000, 6-9 July.
34. Bricongne JC, Lionel F, Guillaume G, et al. Firms and the global crisis: French exports in the turmoil. Journal of International Economics. 2012, 87, 134-146. [DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.07.002]
35. Mehregan N, Asgary A , Rezaei R. Effects of the Bam earthquake on employment: a shift-share analysis. Disasters. 2012, 36(3), 420-438. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01268.x]
36. Knudsen DC. Shift-share analysis: further examination of models for the description of economic change. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2000, 34(3), 177-98. [DOI:10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00016-6]
37. Lonsdale RE, Archer JC. Changing employment patterns on the northern and central Great Plains'. Great Plains Research. 1995, 5(1), 47-70.
38. World Trade Organization (WTO), Time Series on international trade, Exports and imports of major commodity groups by region and selected economy, 1980-2013.
39. Escaith H, Keck A, Nee C, et al. Japan's earthquake and tsunami: International trade and global supply chain impacts London: VoxEU. org. available at: http://www.voxeu.org/article/japans-earthquake-and-tsunami-global-supply-chain-impacts (accessed October 21, 2013).