XML Print


Design, Construction, and Planning, University of Florida
Abstract:   (55 Views)
Introduction: Most studies have analyzed how natural disasters exert a severe impact on the regional level in the disaster period based on quantitative methods. This study aimed to highlight how Hurricane Florence exerts an impact on human life and societies across US states in a multitude of periods by employing both qualitative and quantitative methods.
Methods: This study developed a new app called “Twitgis,” collected 1,433,032 tweets, and employed 57,842 data filtered for Hurricane Florence between 08-21-2018 and 10-01-2018.
Results: First, this study showed that the spatial patterns of tweets are differentiated by periods. For example, the spatial patterns of tweets are more concentrated in the south region in the pre-hurricane period, the spatial patterns of tweets are heavily concentrated in the Southeast region in the hurricane period, and the spatial patterns of tweets are more located in the Northeast region in the post-hurricane period. Second, the most retweeted tweet shows that human sentiment plays an important role in disaster information more than news of the hurricane in online communication. The first ranked tweet is about two times higher than the sum of the retweet numbers between the top two and top 20. Third, this study found that people actively utilize Twitter to share a lot of emotions, opinions, information, and so on for Hurricane Florence. For instance, about one-fifth of tweets in the sentiment analysis are emotions for the hurricane event.
Conclusions: Governments and policymakers should monitor Twitter data to understand the effects of natural disasters on people and the human environment.
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2020/06/12 | Accepted: 2020/08/16

References
1. Wang T. Global number of natural disasters events 2000-2019. Available at: URL: https:// www. statista. com/ statistics/ 510959/ number- of-natural-disasters-events-globally/ Last Access: Jul 16, 2020.
2. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. Natural disasters since 1900-over 8 million deaths and 7 trillion US dollars damage. Available at: URL: https:// phys. org/ news/ 2016-04- natural-disasters- 1900over- milliondeaths.Html Last Access: Jul 16, 2020.
3. Demuth JL, Morss RE, Palen L, et al. Sometimes da# beachlife ain't always da wave. Understanding people's evolving hurricane risk communication, risk assessments, and responses using Twitter narratives. Weather, climate, and society. 2018 ;10(3):537-60. [DOI:10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0126.1]
4. Malmstadt J, Scheitlin K, Elsner J. Florida hurricanes and damage costs. southeastern geographer. 2009 Jul 1;49(2):108-31. [DOI:10.1353/sgo.0.0045]
5. Martín Y, Cutter SL, Li Z. Bridging twitter and survey data for evacuation assessment of Hurricane Matthew and Hurricane Irma. Natural hazards review. 2020 May 1;21(2):04020003. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000354]
6. Pielke Jr RA, Gratz J, Landsea CW, Collins D, Saunders MA, Musulin R. Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900-2005. Natural Hazards Review. 2008 Feb;9(1):29-42. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:1(29)]
7. National hurricane center. Costliest U.S. Tropical Cyclones. National Hurricane Center: Florida. 2018: 1-3.
8. Thompson MA. Hurricane Katrina and economic loss: an alternative measure of economic activity. Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis. 2009 Apr 15;4(2) 1-9. [DOI:10.2202/1932-9156.1034]
9. Degg M. Natural disasters: recent trends and future prospects. Geography. 1992 Jul 1:198-209.
10. Jonkman SN. Global perspectives on loss of human life caused by floods. Natural hazards. 2005 Feb 1;34(2):151-75. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-004-8891-3]
11. Levine M, Thompson K. Identity, place, and bystander intervention: Social categories and helping after natural disasters. The Journal of social psychology. 2004 Jun 1;144(3):229-45. [DOI:10.3200/SOCP.144.3.229-245] [PMID]
12. Neumayer E, Plümper T. The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981-2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2007 Sep 1;97(3):551-66. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00563.x]
13. Rodriguez-Oreggia E, De La Fuente A, De La Torre R, Moreno HA. Natural disasters, human development and poverty at the municipal level in Mexico. The Journal of Development Studies. 2013 Mar 1;49(3):442-55. [DOI:10.1080/00220388.2012.700398]
14. Wang B, Zhuang J. Crisis information distribution on Twitter: a content analysis of tweets during Hurricane Sandy. Natural hazards. 2017 Oct 1;89(1):161-81. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-017-2960-x]
15. Zou L, Lam NS, Cai H, Qiang Y. Mining Twitter data for improved understanding of disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 2018 Sep 3;108(5): 1422-41. [DOI:10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897]
16. Von Peter G, Von Dahlen S, Saxena SC. Unmitigated disasters? New evidence on the macroeconomic cost of natural catastrophes. 2012 Dec; BIS Working Papers No 394: 1-38.
17. Felbermayr G, Gröschl J. Naturally negative: The growth effects of natural disasters. Journal of development economics. 2014 Nov 1;111:92-106. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.07.004]
18. Acar A, Muraki Y. Twitter for crisis communication: lessons learned from Japan's tsunami disaster. International Journal of Web Based Communities. 2011 Jan 1;7(3):392-402. [DOI:10.1504/IJWBC.2011.041206]
19. Earle PS, Bowden DC, Guy M. Twitter earthquake detection: earthquake monitoring in a social world. Annals of Geophysics. 2012 Jan 14;54(6): 708-715.
20. Muralidharan S, Rasmussen L, Patterson D, Shin JH. Hope for Haiti: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public Relations Review. 2011 Jun 1;37(2):175-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.010]
21. Velev D, Zlateva P. An innovative approach for designing an emergency risk management system for natural disasters. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 2011 Oct 1;2(5):407-413.
22. Kim J, Hastak M. Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster. International Journal of Information Management. 2018 Feb 1;38(1):86-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.003]
23. Cheong F, Cheong C. Social Media Data Mining: A Social Network Analysis Of Tweets During The 2010-2011 Australian Floods. PACIS. 2011 Jul 9;46:1-16.
24. Ahmouda A, Hochmair HH, Cvetojevic S. Using Twitter to Analyze the Effect of Hurricanes on Human Mobility Patterns. Urban Science. 2019 Sep;3(3):87, 1-20. [DOI:10.3390/urbansci3030087]
25. Kumar D, Ukkusuri SV. Utilizing geo-tagged tweets to understand evacuation dynamics during emergencies: A case study of Hurricane Sandy. InCompanion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 2018 Apr 23: 1613-1620. [DOI:10.1145/3184558.3191619]
26. Wang Q, Taylor JE. Quantifying human mobility perturbation and resilience in Hurricane Sandy. PLoS one. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112608. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0112608] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Nagar S, Seth A, Joshi A. Characterization of social media response to natural disasters. InProceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web 2012 Apr 16, 671-674. [DOI:10.1145/2187980.2188177]
28. Bruns A, Stieglitz S. Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of technology in human services. 2012 Jul 1;30(3-4):160-185. [DOI:10.1080/15228835.2012.744249]
29. D'Auria L, Convertito V. Real-time mapping of earthquake perception areas in the Italian region from Twitter streams analysis. Earthquakes and their impact on society 2016, 619-630. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-21753-6_26]
30. Wang Q, Taylor JE. Patterns and limitations of urban human mobility resilience under the influence of multiple types of natural disaster. PLoS one. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147299. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0147299] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Karamshuk D, Shaw F, Brownlie J, Sastry N. Bridging big data and qualitative methods in the social sciences: A case study of Twitter responses to high profile deaths by suicide. Online Social Networks and Media. 2017 Jun 1;1:33-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2017.01.002]
32. CIRA/RAMMB; GOES-16/NOAA
33. https://developer.twitter.com
34. https://twitter.com/Michgonewild/status/1038841840605298689
35. https://twitter.com/WaffleHouseNews/status/1039606662234075137/photo/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Disaster and Emergency Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb