Volume 2, Issue 2 (July - December 2019)                   JDER 2019, 2(2): 115-123 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dehghani Tafti A, Nasiriani K, Hajimaghsoudi M, Maki M, Mirzaei S, Eftekhari A. The Most Common Tools to Measure Trauma Severity: A review Study. JDER. 2019; 2 (2) :115-123
URL: http://jder.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-40-en.html
Department of Health in Emergency and Disaster, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (251 Views)
Introduction: Due to the increasing mortality rate from trauma, determining the severity of injury has a very important role in the prognosis of the injured person. On the other hand, the quality of medical care provided to the casualties is evaluated using the Trauma Scoring System. Various scales were used to determine the trauma severity of injured. In this study, the most commonly used tools are investigated.
Methods: This review was conducted by searching throughout the Persian data bases of Magiran, Barakat, SID and English databases of Scopus, Web of sciences, PubMed, and Google scholar. To conduct the search, the following keywords were used: "Severity of Trauma", "Trauma scoring", and "Trauma Scoring System" without considering any time intervals. Our early search resulted in 2125 articles. Finally, 17 articles were analyzed and different functions of traumatic assessment tools were compared and studied.
Results: Traumatic assessment methods vary based on the anatomical and physiological parameters and composition of these two methods. In this study, the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) were considered as anatomical parameters; Revised Trauma Score (RTS) as physiological parameters; Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOST) were mentioned as a hybrid ranking system.
Conclusion: Application of accurate scientific evaluations in trauma severity assessment methods and application of each method in its appropriate position would result in appropriate improvements in the development of trauma care.  In addition, these systems can play an important role in providing care to patients with traumatic injuries in the present and future.
 
Full-Text [PDF 583 kb]   (49 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (7 Views)  
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/11/16 | Accepted: 2019/03/9 | Published: 2019/09/29

References
1. Zamani M, Esmailian M, Mirazimi MS, et al. Cause and final outcome of trauma in patients referred to the emergency department; a cross sectional study. Iranian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014;1(1):22-7.[Persian]. 2. Sarlak MA, Kolivand P. Effects of Organizational Trauma on Staff Skills in a Private Hospital in Iran. Shefaye Khatam. 2016;4(1):45-54.[Persian] 3. Ebrahimi M, Pirazghandi H, Reihani HR. How is the injury severity scored? a brief review of scoring systems. Reviews in Clinical Medicine. 2015; 2(3):125-8. 4. Salehi SH, Razmjoo I. Prognosis assessment of The Injury Severity Score in traffic accidents. Iranian South Medical Journal. 2006; 9 (1):45-50 [Persian]. 5. Lecky F, Woodford M, Edwards A, et al. Trauma scoring systems and databases. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014;113(2):286-94. 6. Brenneman FD, Boulanger BR, McLellan BA, et al. Measuring injury severity: time for a change. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery1998;44(4):580-2. 7. Sutherland AG, Johnston AT, Hutchison JD. The new injury severity score: better prediction of functional recovery after musculoskeletal injury. Value in Health. 2006;9(1):24-7. 8. de Alencar Domingues C, Coimbra R, Poggetti RS, et al. New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction. World journal of Emergency Surgery. 2018;13(1):12. 9. Senkowski CK, McKenney MG. Trauma scoring systems: a review. Journal of the American College of Surgeons.1999;189(5):491-503. 10. Moradi Lakeh M, Tehrani Banihashemi S, Varasteh Kia G, et al. Comparison of trauma scoring systems for prediction of patients’prognosis. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2002; 9(28):129-37. [Persian]. 11. Lin X, Gao J, Dingyuan D, et al. Value of AIS-ISS for evaluation of trauma in the elderly. Chinese Journal of Trauma. 2014;30(7):702-5. 12. Harwood PJ, Giannoudis PV, Probst C, et al. Which AIS based scoring system is the best predictor of outcome in orthopaedic blunt trauma patients? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2006;60(2):334-40. 13. Moradi Lakeh M, Tehrani Seyed A, Varasteh Kia G, et al. Comparison of trauma scoring systems for prediction of patients’ prognosis. Iran university of medical sciences. 2003;9(28):129-38. 14. Valderrama-Molina CO, Giraldo N, Constain A, et al. Validation of trauma scales: ISS, NISS, RTS and TRISS for predicting mortality in a Colombian population. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2017;27(2):213-20. 15. Whitaker IY, Gennari TD, Whitaker AL. The difference between ISS and NISS in a series of trauma patients in Brazil. InAnnual Proceedings/Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 2003; 47:301. 16. Wisner DH. History and current status of trauma scoring systems. Archives of Surgery. 1992; 127(1):111-7. 17. Yousefzadeh-Chabok S, Hosseinpour M, Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati L, et al. Comparison of revised trauma score, injury severity score and trauma and injury severity score for mortality prediction in elderly trauma patients. Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2016;22(6):536-40. 18. Gholipour C, Vahdati SS, Irandoust A, et al. The value of early & post resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale in prediction of prognosis of blunt trauma patients: A pilot study. Trauma Epidemiology Journal. 2016;1(1):1-3. 19. Oestern H, Kabus K. Comparison of various trauma score systems. An overview. Der Unfallchirurg. 1994;97(4):177-84. 20. Schluter PJ, Nathens A, Neal ML, et al. Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2010;68(4):761-70. 21. Taylor MD, Tracy JK, Meyer W, et al. Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2002;53(3):407-14. 22. Frankema SP, Edwards MJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Predicting survival after trauma: A comparison of TRISS and ASCOT in the Netherlands. European Journal of Trauma. 2002;28(6):355-64. 23. Lo JW, Bunce C, Charteris D, et al. A phase III, multi-centre, double-masked randomised controlled trial of adjunctive intraocular and peri-ocular steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) versus standard treatment in eyes undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for open globe trauma (ASCOT): statistical analysis plan. Trials. 2016;17(1):383. 24. Orhon R, Eren SH, Karaday S, et al. Comparison of trauma scores for predicting mortality and morbidity on trauma patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014;20(4):258-64. 25. Shen L, Wei W. Effect of trauma scoring system and combined score on the trauma response of acute trauma; patients. Chinese Journal of
2. Practical Nursing. 2016;32(24):1841-4. 26. Cops W, sacco W, champion H, editors. Progress in characterising Anatomic “Injury”,. In proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive medicine; Baltimor, MA, USA. 27. Garcia AF, Sanjuan J, Ortiz AIS, et al. Trauma Severity and Not the Socio-Economic Variables Determine Survival after Penetrating Trauma in a Medium-Income Country. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2015;221(4):S89. 28. Lennquist S. Medical response to major incidents and disasters: a practical guide for all medical staff: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. 29. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al. Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 1996;40(1):42-9. 30. Bouamra O, Jacques R, Edwards A, et al. Prediction modelling for trauma using comorbidity and ‘true’30-day outcome. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2015;32(12):933-8. 31. Mendoza-Lattes S, Besomi J, O'Sullivan C, et al. Pediatric Spine Trauma in the United States–Analysis of the HCUP Kid'S Inpatient Database (KID) 1997–2009. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal. 2015;35:135.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Disaster and Emergency Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb